# have you seen this founder ownership report?

Canonical: https://brew.new/browse/templates/email/pt1_k97s3bwta2hr6yr9bkz8yp35298e59vm

Brand: founderpath.com
Category: newsletter

![Preview of have you seen this founder ownership report?](https://cdn.brew.new/email-preview-207d434251c51739-tracking_r57mmqm8tahr6ced94sy62ajsd8dvt63-1789002282453.png)

## Email content

It's Nathan.

I'm looking at the new 2026 Founder Ownership Report from Carta.

Carta tracks equity and cap tables for 50,000+ startups.

Here's a stat I can't stop thinking about:

At Series C, the median founding team owns 16.1% of their company.

The employee equity pool is 16.8%.

Founders own less of their company than the equity pool set aside for their employees.

Carta

Here's how the dilution stacks up round by round:

Seed: founders keep 56%

Series A: down to 36%

Series C: down to 16.1% (employee pool passes them at 16.8%)

Series D: down to 10.4%

By Series C, the company breaks down into three slices: founders, employees, and investors.

Except the investor slice is 4x bigger than the founder slice.

Here's why:

Every VC round does two things at once:

VCs take a chunk (usually 15-25% per round)

The employee pool gets refreshed (5-10% per round to attract new hires)

Both come out of the founders' pockets.

Four rounds in, you don't own your company anymore. Your investors do.

There's another way: non-dilutive capital.

Non-dilutive capital is any funding that doesn't take equity from your business.

You keep 100% ownership

No warrants in some options

No board seats or dilution at exit

For SaaS founders with predictable revenue, it's a smarter choice than VC.

A sneak peek of the options every SaaS founder should consider before raising:

(See full breakdown of non-dilutive funding here)

Screenshot 2026-04-28 at 4.28.38 PM

One example of how this plays out in real life:

Badger Maps, a SaaS company at $8m revenue, used non-dilutive capital twice:

First, revenue financing to fund growth

Then, a $4.2m term loan to scale

Details of the deal:

Revenue: $8m

Size: $4.2m ($2.8m at start)

Interest rate: 17%

Interest only period: 2 years

Warrants: None

Fees: No exit fees

Time to close: 20 days

Would you consider a deal like this?

If you're at $1m+ in revenue, you can do the same.

Get life-changing capital without selling your equity

It takes 2 minutes to get a term sheet.

Or just hit reply - I'm answering questions in the next hour.

Nathan Latka

CEO, Founderpath

PS: Details of other deals we've closed can be found here: https://founderpath.com/blog/category/case-study. We've wired $220m to over 550 SaaS companies.

Founderpath_logo_icon_color-1

Founderpath, 815A Brazos Street, , Austin,TX,78701,USA,(210) 718-8920

If you do not want to receive CEO training invites, SaaS templates, or tactics from other CEOs, you can Unsubscribe or Manage Preferences. No new SaaS tactics will be sent to you.

[Open and remix this design](https://brew.new/browse/templates/email/pt1_k97s3bwta2hr6yr9bkz8yp35298e59vm)

[Browse email designs](https://brew.new/browse/templates)